AMSA

Hong Kong Flag Concern on PSC Detention and Checklist

Posted on

Hong Kong flag administration has analysed the detention of its flag vessel for the period from 1 Jan 2015 to 31st July 2015. total 37 vessel were detained during this period, out of which 17 vessels were detained by AMSA and 5 were detained by USCG.

Upon analysis of all detentions, it is noticed that the most common detainable deficiencies registered by the PSCOs are relating. to fire damper, fire flaps, fixed fire extinguishing system, emergency fire pump, lifeboat, rescue boat, emergency generator. back up batteries. air pipe, garbage and in some cases all deficiencies were concluded by an ISM Code major nonconformity in respect of maintenance, key shipboard operations or emergency preparedness.
To avoid further detention of Hong Kong registered ships, a detailed check-list for the most common detainable deficiencies has been developed by Marine Department. Administration urges ship masters to carry out inspection as guided to avoid detention due to these common detainable deficiencies prior to arriving any ports, in particular to Australian and US ports.

DOWNLOAD CHECK LIST

Source: Mardep, Hong Kong

AMSA’s Concerns on Free Fall Lifeboat Safety

Posted on

AMSA Published a Marine Notice alerting the maritime industry to findings of two recent accident investigations conducted by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) and the New Zealand Transport Accident Investigation Commission (TIAC). These investigations have highlighted ongoing safety issues related to free-fall lifeboats and identified maintenance issues that the maritime industry should be aware of.

Chapter III, Regulation 20 of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) requires operational readiness, maintenance, and inspection of lifeboats and rescue boats. Under applicable Australian law, owners and operators are responsible for implementing effective routines and procedures that meet SOLAS requirements. These incidents reinforce the need to ensure effective implementation of these processes.

AMSA continues to observe numerous defects and deficiencies related to ship’s lifeboats and liferafts. This is difficult to understand given the IMO and AMSA focus on risks associated with the incorrect operation and maintenance of survival craft.
Wire failure was the critical factor in both the Aquarosa and Da Dan Xia incidents. This highlights the importance of:

  1. Ships’ crews following established maintenance procedures and being vigilant and observant during all maintenance tasks.
  2. The examination of maintenance procedures to ensure they are effective.
  3. Effective crew familiarization and training, to minimise risk when crew are conducting test procedures and training drills.

Marine Notice 2/2014 highlighted the requirement for additional restraints to be installed on lifeboats during AMSA inspections. This requirement is a control mechanism that AMSA has implemented to reduce the AMSA inspector’s exposure to risk. It is recommended that these restraints be used anytime maintenance is being carried out on lifeboats. The continued cooperation of all owners, operators and masters is appreciated.

READ MARINE NOTICE

Master and Owner Found Guilty of Illegal Garbage Disposal in the Great Barrier Reef

Posted on

The Australian Maritime Safety Authority has successfully prosecuted the master and owners of the Hong Kong registered bulk carrier ANL Kardinia for illegally dumping garbage in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

One Armania Shipping Ltd and the master of ANL Kardinia were found guilty on July 20 in the Townsville Magistrates Court on one charge each of illegally disposing of garbage under the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983.

The illegal discharge took place on 13 February 2015 and was detected by an AMSA Inspector during a routine Port State Control inspection in Brisbane on 16 February 2015.

The AMSA Inspector examined ANL Kardinia’s Garbage Record Book and discovered an entry for a discharge of food waste within the prohibited discharge area of the Great Barrier Reef.

One Armania Shipping Ltd was fined $4,000 and the master was fined $300 for the illegal discharge.

AMSA Chief Executive Officer Mick Kinley said masters and owners of vessels should be warned that the illegal discharge of ships’ waste would not be tolerated in Australian waters.

“Australia has a robust Port State Control regime, designed to ensure ship owners and their masters are following the rules and regulations to prevent marine areas from being polluted,” said Mr Kinley.”

“These prosecutions are a reminder to the shipping community if they flout the regulations they can be caught and prosecuted.”

Source: AMSA

AMSA 2014 Annual Report on PSC

Posted on

2014 marked the introduction of a significant step-change in Australia’s response to ships and operators who perform poorly on a consistent basis. In November and December 2014 AMSA used the directions power provided in section 246 of the Navigation Act 2012 to ban 2 ships from entering or using Australian ports for a period of 3 months.
During the calendar year 2014, 26,936 ship arrivals by 5674 foreign-flagged ships of which  3742 vessel inspected and resulted in 269 ship detentions. Bulk carriers accounted for 49 per cent of ship arrivals and 57 per cent of PSC inspections. PSC inspections were carried out in 54 Australian ports.

There was a total of 269 vessels detained in 2014.The average detention rate for all vessels was 7.2%. During 2014, AMSA surveyors recorded a total of 10,892 deficiencies giving a deficiency rate of 2.9 per inspection compared to 2.4 per inspection in 2013.

By drawing comparisons based on 10 years of Australian PSC data the outcome may be considered, at first view, to be disappointing with the apparent stabilisation of annual PSC deficiency and detention rates over the last 5 years. While there have been modest improvements experienced across a number of areas, the overall picture indicates that the international community’s PSC/ FSC efforts are not delivering lasting results. The principal causes of detention remain consistently related to International Safety Management (ISM), fire safety, lifesaving appliances and pollution prevention. It seems difficult to reconcile how well established requirements for fire safety, lifesaving appliances and pollution prevention continue to be such significant issues.

READ THE ANNUAL REPORT

Source: AMSA

Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from International Shipping

Posted on

AMSA issued a Marine Notice 11/2015, superseding 13/2012 and the purpose of this Marine Notice is to provide information to ship owners and operators on technical and operational measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships.

Amendments to Annex VI of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) introducing the mandatory global greenhouse gas reduction regime for the international industry sector were adopted at the 62nd session of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) in 2011 and entered into force on 1 January 2013.

A new Chapter 4 entitled Regulations on Energy Efficiency for Ships has been added to MARPOL Annex VI which mandates:

  • an Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for certain new ships;
  • a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) for certain ships; and
  • a requirement for certain ships to carry an International Energy Efficiency (IEE) Certificate.

The new chapter 4 applies to ships of 400 gross tonnage and above engaged in international voyages, however does not apply to some ships not propelled by mechanical means, and platforms including FPSOs and FSUs and drilling rigs, regardless of their propulsion.

Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for new ships

The EEDI is a non-prescriptive, performance-based mechanism that leaves the choice of technologies to use in a specific ship design to the industry. As long as the required energy efficiency level is attained, ship designers and builders are free to use the most cost-effective solutions for the ship to comply with the regulations. The EEDI standards are being phased in from 2013 to 2025.

In general form, the EEDI formula may be expressed as:

EEDI = CO2 emission/transport work where:

  • the carbon-dioxide (CO2) emission represents total CO2 emission from combustion of fuel, including propulsion and auxiliary engines and boilers, taking into account the carbon content of the fuels in question; and
  • the transport work is calculated by multiplying the ship’s capacity as designed (deadweight for cargo ships and gross tonnage for passenger ships) with the ship’s design speed measured at the maximum design load condition and at 75 per cent of the rated installed shaft power.

The 66th session of the MEPC agreed to extend the application of the EEDI regulations to “new” ships of the following types that use conventional propulsion methods:

  • container ships
  • refrigerated cargo carriers
  • tankers
  • combination carriers
  • roll on roll off cargo ships
  • container ships
  • refrigerated cargo carriers
  • tankers
  • combination carriers
  • roll on roll off cargo ships

These ships are required to have an ‘attained EEDI’ and will need to meet the EEDI regulations requiring an improvement in energy efficiency up to 2025

A “new” ship means a ship:

  • for which the building contract is placed on or after 1 January 2013; or
  • in the absence of a building contract, the keel of which is laid or which is at a similar stage of construction on or after 1 July 2013; or
  • the delivery of which is on or after 1 July 2015.

Conventional propulsion means a method of propulsion where a main reciprocating internal combustion engine(s) is the prime mover and coupled to a propulsion shaft, either directly or through a gear box.

Cruise passenger ships using non-conventional propulsion and LNG carriers using conventional or non-conventional propulsion, delivered on or after 1 September 2019, will also need to have an attained EEDI and meet the EEDI regulations requiring an improvement in energy efficiency up to 2025. Non-conventional propulsion methods include diesel-electric propulsion, turbine propulsion and hybrid propulsion systems. The EEDI regulations do not apply to cargo ships that have ice-breaking capability.

According to the IMO, the EEDI now covers approximately 85 per cent of the CO2 emissions from international shipping.

Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) for all ships

The SEEMP establishes a mechanism for operators to improve the energy efficiency of ships. Potential operational efficiency measures include:

  • improved hull and propulsion system maintenance;
  • voyage planning;
  • weather routeing;
  • speed optimisation; and
  • use of automated engine management systems.

Each ship is required to keep a ship specific SEEMP on board, which may form part of the ship’s Safety Management System. The SEEMP for each ship is to be developed taking into account guidelines adopted by the IMO (see below).

A critical element to consider in developing a SEEMP is the need to set a goal to create an incentive for proper implementation, and then to increase commitment to the improvement of energy efficiency. The goal can take any form, such as the annual fuel consumption or a specific target of Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (EEOI).

The EEOI developed by IMO (see below) is one of the internationally established tools to obtain a quantitative indicator of energy efficiency of a ship and/or fleet in operation, and can be used for this purpose.

International Energy Efficiency Certificate

All ships of 400 gross tons and above engaged in international voyages need to be issued with an International Energy Efficiency (IEE) Certificate. Owners and operators of Australian ships engaged in international trade should ensure the IEE Certificate is issued and available after the first intermediate or renewal survey, whichever is the first, on or after 1 January 2013. Classification Societies have been authorised to issue the certificates for Australian vessels.

Additional information

This Marine Notice provides only a summary of the new regulations. For further details on determining the requirements for each specific ship, please refer to MARPOL Annex VI and the MEPC Resolutions that have been developed to support these new regulations:

  • Resolution MEPC.213(63) – 2012 Guidelines for the development of a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP)
  • Resolution MEPC.231(65) – 2013 Guidelines for calculation of reference lines for use with the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)
  • Resolution MEPC.233(65) – 2013 Guidelines for calculation of reference lines for use with the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for cruise passenger ships having non-conventional propulsion
  • Resolution MEPC.245(66) – 2014 Guidelines on the method of calculation of the attained Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for new ships;
  • Resolution MEPC.254(67) – 2014 Guidelines on Survey and Certification of the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI)

The IMO has also issued a number of circulars providing additional information on the new regulations. The relevant circulars are:

  • MEPC.1/Circ.682 – Interim Guidelines for Voluntary Verification of EEDI
  • MEPC.1/Circ.684 – Guidelines for Voluntary use of EEOI.

Copies of these Resolutions and circulars can be obtained from the IMO website or by contactingeps@amsa.gov.au.

The Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983, Navigation Act 2012 and Marine Part 97 give effect to the new regulations.

READ THE NOTICE

Source: AMSA

AMSA Advice on Reducing Risk of Collision

Posted on

AMSA issued a marine notice 14/2015 and supersedes 05/2012, 04/2012, 11/2011. The purpose of this Marine Notice is to remind masters, skippers, watchkeepers and all other personnel involved in the operation of vessels about the importance of adhering to the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea 1972 (known as the Collision Regulations or COLREGs). This Notice also provides guidance for fishing vessels, yachts, barges and towing vessels to reduce the risk of collisions at sea.

Application of COLREGs

The COLREGs apply to all vessels including barges, tugs, yachts, both commercial and recreational fishing vessels and all types of cargo and passenger vessels whether underway or at anchor. These regulations are applicable in all navigable waters, from inland waters to the high seas. The Navigation Act 2012 and Marine Order 30 (Prevention of Collisions) implements the COLREGs for Australian vessels and for other vessels operating in Australian waters. Contravention of COLREGs may jeopardise the safety of life at sea and constitutes an offence, for which substantial penalties may apply1.

The COLREGs recognise the limitations associated with the navigation of different types of vessels in different waterways. For example, larger vessels may not be able to reduce speed quickly and will often require more sea-room to slow down or alter course. In confined waters, such as the Great Barrier Reef, large or deep draught vessels may not be able to deviate from their intended course without the risk of running aground. Smaller vessels may also be slow to manoeuvre and may experience difficulty keeping themselves clear of larger ships. Close quarter situations and potential collisions between vessels can be minimised by proper application of, and adherence to, the COLREGs and the observance of good seamanship.

General responsibility

It is the responsibility of masters, skippers, watch-keepers and all other personnel involved in the operation of vessels to have a thorough knowledge of navigational practices, good seamanship techniques and most importantly, a full understanding and application of the COLREGs. The bridge of any vessel should always be appropriately manned and the person in charge of a navigational watch should not undertake any other duties that would interfere with the safe navigation of the vessel. A continuous listening watch on VHF Channel 16 should be maintained by all bridge watchkeepers.

The COLREGs require all vessels to:

  • maintain a proper lookout at all times (including while at anchor);
  • exhibit appropriate day shapes, night navigational lights, and use sound signals as required;
  • proceed at a safe speed, appropriate to the prevailing circumstances and conditions;
  • use all available means to determine if any risk of collision exists; and
  • take early, positive and readily apparent actions to avoid close quarter situations.

Inappropriate use of navigational lights and shapes

AMSA is aware that, in some cases, vessels unjustifiably display Not Under Command (NUC) lights and shapes. NUC lights and shapes should only be exhibited when a vessel is unable to manoeuvre as required by the COLREGs, due to exceptional circumstances. Therefore, in circumstances which cannot be reasonably justified as ‘exceptional’, the use of NUC lights or shapes is considered a contravention of the COLREGs.

Safety of fishing vessels

Under the COLREGs vessels are only considered to be ‘engaged in fishing’ when using ‘nets, lines or trawls or other fishing apparatus which restrict manoeuvrability’. Vessels are not considered to be engaged in fishing when using ‘trolling lines or other fishing apparatus which do not restrict manoeuvrability’. Also, a vessel engaged in fishing does not always have the right of way. The COLREGs clearly state that a vessel engaged in fishing shall:

  • not impede the passage of any other vessel navigating within a narrow channel or fairway;
  • not impede the passage of any vessel following a traffic lane; and
  • avoid impeding the safe passage of a vessel constrained by its draught.

Fishing vessels can reduce the risk of collisions by:

  • not fishing in the vicinity of areas used by large vessels;
  • avoiding erratic and unpredictable manoeuvres when in the vicinity of larger vessels;
  • not anchoring in and around busy sea lanes, particularly at night;
  • exhibiting appropriate lights and shapes by day or night, and ensuring that the required lights and shapes are only displayed when the vessel is engaged in fishing; and
  • ensuring status and data of the vessel’s Automatic Identification System (if fitted) are entered and displayed correctly.

Safety of yachts

Yachts often provide poor radar targets due to their construction or size. Yachts do not always maintain a steady course and can make unexpected course alterations. Skippers of yachts should not assume their vessel has been seen by an approaching vessel in good time. In some circumstances, it may not be possible for large vessels to keep clear of a yacht or be able to take the appropriate action in good time. It is vital for yachts to monitor the movement of all traffic in their vicinity and to be aware of their COLREGs obligations.

Some precautions recommended for yachts include:

  • keeping a good visual and radar lookout;
  • not impeding the passage of large vessels that have limited room to manoeuvre;
  • avoiding major shipping routes as far as possible, particularly where heavy traffic prevails;
  • avoiding unexpected course alterations when in the vicinity of large vessels;
  • fitting a radar reflector, an anti-collision radar transponder or a radar target enhancer;
  • ensuring status and data of the vessel’s Automatic Identification System (if fitted) are entered and displayed correctly; and
  • ensuring watchkeepers are not distracted from navigational duties.

Safety of barges

Accident reports indicate that casualties involving collisions with anchored barges or barges under tow, some of which have resulted in loss of life, continue to occur due to the lack of a proper lookout. Barge lights may be difficult to detect as they are often installed at a lower height than that of a cargo vessel of similar length.

To reduce the risk of collisions, the following precautions are recommended for barges including:

  • being fitted with appropriate navigation lights complying with the relevant provisions in the COLREGs;
  • where fitted, side lights should have adequate inboard screening and horizontal sectoring; and
  • while at anchor, navigational lights should be supplemented by additional deck lights. Where possible, lights should be placed to mark the sides and corner extremities of the barge / tow.

Safety of towing vessel and tow

In addition to assessing the situation and risk of collision, watchkeepers on towing vessels should be alert for the presence of other vessels, navigational dangers, wrecks and debris in the vicinity of both the towing vessel and the vessel under tow. During a towing operation, in addition to the towing vessel, an object such as a barge under tow, must exhibit the appropriate navigation lights, shapes and, if manned, make the sound signals as required by the COLREGs. Due consideration should also be given to the reliability of the lights and sound signals and their ability to function for the duration of the intended voyage. Where practicable, it is recommended that a duplicate system of lights be available.

Petroleum safety zones around offshore facilities

The attention of masters, skippers, watchkeepers and all other personnel involved in the operation of vessels is also drawn to the petroleum safety zones which may be established via notice by the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA). These notices are published in the Government Notices Gazette for the purpose of protecting offshore petroleum wells, structures, or associated equipment and may prohibit:

  1. all vessels; or
  2. all vessels other than specified vessels; or
  3. all vessels other than the vessels included in specified classes of vessels;

from entering or being present in a specified area (the petroleum safety zone) surrounding the petroleum well, structure or equipment without the written consent of NOPSEMA.

A petroleum safety zone may extend to a distance of 500 metres around the well, structure or equipment specified in the notice, where that distance is measured from each point of the outer edge of the well, structure or equipment.

It is an offence for a vessel to enter or be present in a petroleum safety zone in breach of a notice, with penalties of up to 15 years imprisonment.

All current Gazetted notices, NOPSEMA’s policy, applicable forms, and a petroleum safety zone subscription service are available from the NOPSEMA Website www.nopsema.gov.au/safety/petroleum-safety-zones/.

Information on petroleum safety zones is also promulgated by coastal (AUSCOAST) warnings or ‘Notices to Mariners’.

READ THE NOTICE

Establishment of Virtual AIS Aid to Navigation in Torres Strait

Posted on

AMSA has identified a number of instances where deep draught vessels may have transited very close to the charted position of OG Rock in the Prince of Wales Channel.

For deep draught vessels the practice of transiting close to, or over, the charted position of OG Rock may increase risk, lead to a breach of AMSA’s stipulated under keel clearance limit or, in the worst case scenario, lead to a vessel grounding.

To assist deep draught vessels navigate in and around this area, AMSA has established a ‘virtual’ AIS Aid to Navigation (AtoN). A virtual AIS AtoN is an AtoN that can be displayed on vessel’s navigation displays for a location where no actual physical aid to navigation exists.

The virtual AIS AtoN readily and clearly indicates the charted position of OG Rock on navigational displays to assist Mariners keep deep draught vessels well clear of OG Rock and to avoid accidental breaches of Under Keel Clearance limits as stipulated in Marine Order 54.

The virtual AIS AtoN appears in position (WGS84) 10 degrees 29.865 South; 142 degrees 20.753 East. This should display on vessels’ ECDIS / Minimum Keyboard Displays / AIS equipment as a virtual Special Mark. The AIS description will include the text ‘OG Rock’.

Mariners transiting Torres Strait should be familiar with the location of OG Rock and its associated virtual AIS AtoN. Additionally, Mariners should consider the limited room to manoeuvre that is available for deep draught vessels in the vicinity of OG Rock.

Source: AMSA

Australia Releases Online Bio-fouling Risk Assessment Tool

Posted on

The Department of Fisheries for Western Australia issued a notice informing industry that they have developed on line tool named Vessel Check for managers of commercial, non-trading, petroleum, and commercial fishing vessels coming to Western Australia to assess the risks of introduction of invasive marine pests by means of biofouling.

Vessel Check is an online vessel risk assessment tool designed to help manage vessel’s biofouling risk. This tool is the result of ongoing development and testing, in consultation with key stakeholders in government, industry, academia and the community. Vessel Check is intended as a tool to enable vessel managers to take an active role in management of biofouling on their vessels, and reduce their risk of moving marine pests into and around WA. Vessel Check is a voluntary tool.

All vessels entering the state of Western Australia may be subject to inspection by the Department’s compliance team to check the vessel is not carrying a marine pest and so is compliant with the Fish Resources Management Act 1994 (FRMA).

Use of Vessel Check and appropriate management actions to lower the vessel’s biofouling risk will be recognised as strong evidence of an effort to minimise your vessel’s risk.

Vessel Check uses specific vessel information to provide with a risk assessment of the likelihood that any will transfer an IMS to Western Australia, and provides a choice of detailed management actions to reduce this risk.

After completing the questionnaire, the tool will calculate a risk status for the vessel. Person submitting the information  will get a Risk Assessment Report. This report will contain a detailed summary and a range of recommended management options to reduce the vessel risk status.

Vessel Check is intended for use by managers of commercial, non-trading, petroleum and commercial fishing vessels, for all international and interstate vessel movements to Western Australia.

Future versions of Vessel Check for yachts and rigs are being considered for development.

The tool is designed to support ongoing effective management of vessel biofouling, encourage best practice, and helps to minimise the chance of committing offences under the Fish Resources Management Act 1994 and regulations related to transferring non-endemic or noxious fish into WA.

This should be used before vessel movement into WA and before departure, to ensure that vessel risk status is Low / Acceptable.

CLICK HERE to see detailed information

AMSA GENERAL MANAGER ELECTED CHAIRMAN OF INTERNATIONAL MARTIME SAFETY COMMITTEE

Posted on

The Australian Maritime Safety Authority’s (AMSA) Navigation Safety and International Relations General Manager Brad Groves has been elected as Chairman of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee for 2016.
The election was conducted on 11 June, 2015 during the 95th session of MSC at the IMO’s headquarters in London.
The Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) is the International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) senior technical body on safety-related matters, and the appointment is a major achievement in the maritime industry.
Mr Groves has been working at AMSA since 1998, and he was appointed General Manager of the then Maritime Standards Division at AMSA in 2010, before heading up Navigation Safety and International Relations.
His current role has responsibility over a number of maritime safety matters, aids to navigation, the management of vessel tracking, coastal pilotage plus government and international coordination matters.
Mr Groves first became involved with the IMO in 2001. He has previously chaired the IMO sub-committee on Human Element, Training and Watch keeping, and prior to becoming MSC Chairman, Mr Groves headed up Australia’s delegation to the MSC and supported AMSA’s Chief Executive Officer at IMO Council.
He has also been responsible for Australia’s involvement in regional arrangements such as the Asia Pacific Heads of Maritime Safety Agencies (APHoMSA).
Mr Groves said he was honoured and humbled to be elected as chairman of the Maritime Safety Committee, and was looking forward to delivering appropriate outcomes for the maritime community.
“Shipping is one of the world’s great industries but it does have its hazards. It’s long been clear that the best way of improving safety at sea is by developing international regulations that are followed by all shipping nations. This remains at the core of the work of the Maritime Safety Committee and the IMO overall,” Mr Groves said.
“I have seen many issues discussed since I was first involved in MSC discussions. Despite the progress we have made, we still have large responsibilities ahead and I look forward to progressing this important work,” he said.
Mr Groves also expressed his appreciation for the work of previous MSC Chairman, Christian Breinholt, Deputy Director-General of the Danish Maritime Authority

Source: AMSA